Who’s paid so far? – POLITICO

Press play to hearken to this text

Over the previous months, EU-based power firms have scrambled to make sense of imprecise and at instances conflicting statements from Brussels as as to whether paying for Russian fuel in rubles constitutes a breach of EU sanctions.

So far, three EU nations have seen provides of Russian fuel cease over their power firms’ refusal to adjust to a Russian decree issued March 31 requiring fuel funds from “unfriendly countries” to be made through two accounts at Russia’s Gazprombank — one in euros or {dollars}, and one in rubles for a last foreign money conversion.

But many extra power firms are voluntarily making funds through Russian financial institution accounts. All insist these funds are in keeping with EU sanctions.

Guidance from the European Commission has been lower than clear.

In preliminary written authorized steerage despatched privately to nations, the Commission warned the fuel cost technique “would lead to a breach” of EU sanctions.

But in April, printed Commission steerage advised firms that EU sanctions “do not prohibit opening an account with Gazprombank.” It nonetheless recommended consumers may ask the Russian facet to “to fulfil their contractual obligations in the same manner as before the adoption of the Decree.”

And regardless of clamors for extra exact info, up to date written steerage from the Commission later in April made no point out of whether or not ruble accounts would breach EU sanctions.

At a gathering of EU diplomats in mid-May, Commission Director General for Energy Ditte Juul-Jørgensen advised ambassadors the Commission suggested firms to not open a ruble account — however stopped in need of calling doing so a sanctions breach, in accordance with three folks accustomed to the dialogue. She added that ought to Gazprombank convert euros or {dollars} into rubles with out the EU firm explicitly asking for it, the motion may fall exterior the Commission’s enforcement jurisdiction, the folks within the assembly stated.

A Commission spokesperson stated Tuesday they might not “comment on the details of discussions with members states.”

The Russian authorities has stated it’ll launch a full checklist of international firms having opened ruble accounts at Gazprombank as quickly as this week.

A Russian ruble coin is pictured in entrance of the Kremlin | Alexander NemenovV/AFP through Getty Images

In the meantime, this is a rundown of what we all know up to now.

Refused to adjust to Russian decree

Poland’s PGNiG: Company rejected the ruble cost technique April 12. Supplies halted April 27. May sue for provide reinstatement beneath contract.

Bulgaria’s Bulgargaz: Payment as typical refused. Supplies halted April 27.

Finland’s Gasum: Finnish authorities rejected new cost technique April 28. Supplies halted May 21.

Still on the fence

The Netherlands’ GasTerra: The partially state-owned firm declined to touch upon the small print of its Gazprom contract, however stated on May 20 that the shortage of readability on sanctions was “very annoying” and forcing the corporate “to constantly take all sorts of scenarios into account.” GasTerra advised POLITICO on Tuesday the scenario was nonetheless unclear. The authorities additionally stated it could not punish any transfer to open a ruble account with no clear message from Brussels that doing so breaches sanctions. “The Netherlands asked the Commission to clarify the guidance on the part of ruble accounts,” a spokesperson for the Dutch Ministry of Economic Affairs stated Tuesday through e-mail. “More clarity is needed before enforcement of that specific part can take place.”

Continued funds through Russia’s Gazprombank

These firms have continued to pay for and obtain Russian fuel, however the particulars of their settlement with provider Gazprom — and whether or not they’ve opened a ruble-denominated account — is probably not public.

Hungary’s MVM: “We pay in euros, Gazprombank converts the euro, and this amount is paid to Gazprom Export,” Hungarian Foreign Péter Szijjártó stated at a press convention on April 11. He added {that a} new fuel contract between MVM subsidiary CEE Energy and Russia’s Gazprom Export, signed in September, already permits for alternate foreign money funds.

Germany’s VNG: “We will pay the invoice amount, which will continue to be denominated in euros, into the accounts at Gazprombank in accordance with the planned procedure, so that timely payment to our supplier is ensured on our part,” the corporate acknowledged May 9. “We also assume that the conversion into roubles will not cause any difficulties … the opening of the account went completely smoothly.”

Germany’s RWE: “We are prepared for payment in euros and have opened a corresponding account. We are therefore acting in accordance with European and German regulation,” an organization spokesperson stated May 16.

Germany’s Uniper: “Uniper has opened [an] account at Gazprombank and has thus made the arrangements for a contractually compliant payment in euros to this account in accordance with the new payment mechanism,” Chairman Klaus-Dieter Maubach stated May 18.

France’s Engie: “Engie has been in talks with Gazprom regarding the Russian request to modify payment scheme for Russian gas supply. The Group has taken the necessary steps to be ready to execute on its payment obligations, as long as it is compliant with European sanctions’ framework,” the corporate stated May 17.

Italy’s Eni: “Eni has begun the process of opening two … accounts at Gazprom Bank, on a precautionary basis (one in euros and the second in rubles),” the corporate acknowledged May 17.

Austria’s OMV: “We have now implemented a sanctions-compliant payment process that ensures gas deliveries can be paid in a timely manner,” the corporate acknowledged May 20.

The Czech Republic’s ČEZ: “We made the payment in euros in accordance with the recommendation of the European Commission. We will not comment on the details,” a ČEZ spokesperson stated May 20.

Slovakia’s SPP: “Slovakia paid the April invoice in euros according to the valid contract … on the basis of the EU opinion that such payment is not a violation or circumvention of sanctions,” the nation’s financial system ministry stated May 20. The ministry advised POLITICO a smaller regional fuel firm additionally has a Gazprom contract that has been maintained.

Slovenia’s Geoplin: Geoplin “agreed with the Russian partner on a payment procedure that is in accordance with the contract and at the same time within the measures and recommendations of the EU institutions,” firm director Vanja Lombar advised Slovenian tv May 20.

This article is a part of POLITICO Pro

The one-stop-shop answer for coverage professionals fusing the depth of POLITICO journalism with the ability of expertise

Exclusive, breaking scoops and insights

Customized coverage intelligence platform

A high-level public affairs community

Source hyperlink

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.