News

Malaysia Chronicle

In a press release right this moment, Mahathir expressed remorse over Putrajaya’s choice to reach at a settlement final month within the RM2.23 million go well with filed by Apandi in opposition to Mahathir and the federal government for wrongful termination.

Mahathir maintains that the federal government adopted due course of in terminating Apandi’s contract because the nation’s chief authorized advisor.

“At that time, I felt that he could not act independently as he had been an Umno lawyer for a long time. He was unlikely to act fairly in the investigation into 1MDB and the misconduct of (former prime minister) Najib Abdul Razak. Moreover, Apandi said Najib was not guilty because there was no case even before any investigation was carried out,” he stated.

Apandi’s bias was confirmed as Najib was convicted in a High Court and Court of Appeal, stated Mahathir.

Not knowledgeable of settlement

“I plead not guilty and am prepared for Apandi’s claims to be tried in court,” stated Mahathir.

“I was shocked to read the news about the out-of-court settlement being made between the government and Apandi recently. I was not informed about the settlement even though I was a key witness,” added the Langkawi MP.

Mahathir stated he wrote to current AG Idrus Harun that he disagreed with the way in which the settlement was made.

“I feel that the government should not bow down since action that was taken against Apandi was done according to the process and jurisdiction of the government,” stated Mahathir.

While not understanding the settlement phrases between the federal government and Apandi, Mahathir stated the folks have a proper to know these phrases and he questioned how a lot compensation was made to Apandi.

Mohamed Apandi Ali

“Does compensation need to be made if action is taken according to the law? Where is the rule of law? Paying huge compensation to a person who failed to perform his responsibilities well is very regrettable at any time.”

On Oct 13, 2020, Apandi filed a go well with in opposition to Mahathir and the federal government over his alleged illegal termination as AG in the course of the Pakatan Harapan administration in 2018.

Through the lawsuit, Apandi sought, amongst others, declarations that listed defendant Mahathir had dedicated misfeasance or misconduct in public workplace, and that Mahathir had triggered and/or induced a breach of contract between the plaintiff and the second defendant, particularly the federal government.

Special damages

He additionally sought particular damages totalling RM2.23 million, normal damages, exemplary and punitive damages, prices and different aid deemed match by the court docket.

However, by way of a press release of defence filed in November 2020, Mahathir and the federal government insisted that the termination of the contract was legitimate and in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Constitution.

Under Malaysia’s constitutional monarchy system, the Agong as a normal rule acts on the recommendation of the prime minister, on issues such because the appointment of an AG.

On April 13, the Kuala Lumpur High Court recorded a settlement and struck off Apandi’s go well with in opposition to Mahathir and the federal government.  MKINI

Make public phrases of settlement with Apandi, Dr Mahathir tells Putrajaya

PUTRAJAYA have to be clear in regards to the phrases of settlement reached with former attorney-general Apandi Ali, particularly if it includes financial compensation, Dr Mahathir Mohamad stated right this moment.

The former prime minister additionally questioned the federal government’s choice to succeed in a settlement over Apandi’s termination, on condition that it was performed in response to process.

“I was shocked when I read that the government had reached an out-of-court settlement with Apandi, while the terms were kept secret,” he stated in a Facebook put up.

“The authorities mustn’t bow right down to Apandi on condition that his termination was performed in accordance with the facility vested within the authorities.

“I don’t perceive why the settlement have to be stored a secret from the general public if it was performed in response to the rule of regulation.

“Settling with an individual who failed to do his duties is regrettable,” he wrote within the put up.

The Langkawi PM added that Apandi was terminated for his lack of ability to be goal, particularly when it got here to investigations in opposition to former prime minister Najib Razak.

“There is not any manner he may have acted objectively, on condition that he was Umno’s lawyer for a very long time.

“He would not have acted fairly in the 1MDB investigations and in the judgment of Najib’s wrongdoings.”

Apandi had filed the go well with in September 2020, searching for a declaration that the termination of his companies as attorney-general in 2018 by Dr Mahathir was illegal.

He requested for RM2,233,599.36 in particular, punitive and normal damages, to be assessed by the court docket.

However, on April 13, Apandi’s counsel Baljit Singh Sidhu stated Putrajaya had reached an amicable settlement on the previous’s lawsuit over his termination in 2018.

Baljit stated {that a} consent judgment on the settlement was recorded earlier than High Court decide Akhtar Tahir.

“Without prejudice, the government agreed to settle the action without admission of liability. The terms of the settlement remain confidential,” Baljit advised the media.

“The case was struck off without liberty to file afresh and with no order as to costs.”

Baljit additionally confirmed that the go well with was settled as Apandi’s declare was filed in opposition to each the federal government and Dr Mahathir Mohamad in his capability because the then prime minister.

Apandi, who was a former decide, was appointed attorney-general on July 27, 2015. His contract was to have ended on July 26, 2018.

He stated the chief secretary to the federal government had knowledgeable him by way of a letter earlier than the 14th normal election that his tenure could be prolonged by three years.

However, in a letter dated June 5, 2018, the chief secretary knowledgeable him that the Yang di-Pertuan Agong had consented to the termination of his companies however didn’t furnish any doc on the royal approval.

The authorities, in its defence, stated Dr Mahathir didn’t play any function within the termination of Apandi’s companies.

It stated any choice to terminate Apandi’s contract was carried out in response to the regulation.  TMI

MKINI  / THE MALAYSIAN INSIGHT

.



Source hyperlink

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.