Karachi ATC reserves verdict on whether Nazim Jokhio murder case falls under its jurisdiction – Pakistan

A Karachi anti-terrorism court docket (ATC) on Friday reserved its verdict on the destiny of the challan within the Nazim Jokhio homicide case after the prosecution and the investigating officer argued that the case was not associated to terrorism and due to this fact, must be tried by a periods court docket as an alternative of an ATC.

Nazim’s tortured physique was discovered at a farmhouse belonging to PPP MPA Jam Awais final yr in November.

The sufferer’s brother, Afzal Jokhio, had nominated Awais and his older brother MNA Jam Abdul Karim in addition to their guards for murdering 26-year-old Nazim. The deceased had earned the ire of the lawmakers for stopping their international company from searching houbara bustard, a uncommon hen species, in accordance with the first-information report (FIR).

During at present’s listening to, the ATC-XV decide — who’s conducting the trial on the judicial complicated contained in the central jail — heard arguments on whether or not it was throughout the court docket’s jurisdiction to conduct the trial.

Investigating Officer (IO) Inspector Sirajuddin Lashari stated the case didn’t concern an act of terrorism. Therefore, the case could also be transferred from an anti-terrorism court docket to an extraordinary periods court docket for conducting the trial in accordance with the legislation, he argued.

Advocate Rehman Ghous, representing Nazim’s widow Shirin Jokhio, additionally supported the IO’s stance. He stated that because the case didn’t fall throughout the ambit of terrorism, it must be transferred to a periods court docket.

However, Advocate Ali Asghar Narejo — who claimed he was additionally representing the sufferer’s widow — opposed the prosecution’s view. He argued that the offence towards the accused fell throughout the which means of terror, due to this fact, the case was throughout the ambit of the anti-terror legislation.

He urged the decide to conduct the trial in accordance with the legislation.

Advocate Mazhar Ali Junejo, the complainant’s counsel, additionally opposed the prosecution’s stance. He contended that the brutal homicide was meant to terrorise the neighborhood and the sufferer’s clan and due to this fact, the accused must be tried for committing a terrorism offence.

The decide noticed that “on receiving the charge sheet, the jurisdiction of this court has been challenged even by the investigating officer and prosecution, therefore, I am of the humble opinion that firstly the jurisdiction may be decided”.

Advocate Muhammad Jibran Nasir, representing the National Commission for Human Rights (NCHR), urged the court docket to resolve his shopper’s software looking for to hitch trial proceedings. He argued that the group had the locus standi to hitch the case as an intervener.

However, the decide stated that the pending functions can be taken up after the jurisdiction of the court docket to preside over the case was determined. Subsequently, he reserved the decision to be pronounced on May 10.

Source hyperlink

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.