Johnson set to face inquiry into whether he lied to MPs over lockdown parties

Boris Johnson faces the prospect of a parliamentary investigation into whether or not he lied to MPs about Downing Street events in the course of the coronavirus lockdowns.

In response to a backbench revolt, ministers deserted makes an attempt to drive Conservative MPs to vote for a delay in organising any investigation, which means it’s now anticipated to be authorised on Thursday – though it won’t start till police inquiries have concluded.

Labour chief Keir Starmer mentioned the British prime minister had tried to “cover up his misdeeds” by benefiting from the Commons conference to not name somebody a liar.

“The prime minister has stood before this House and said things that are not true, safe in the knowledge that he will not be accused of lying because he can’t be,” Sir Keir mentioned. “He has stood at that despatch field and level clean denied rule-breaking befell, when it did.

“As he did so, he was hoping to gain extra protection from our good faith that no prime minister would deliberately mislead the House.”

MPs will determine whether or not a Commons committee ought to look into allegations that Mr Johnson misled the House together with his repeated denials about Downing Street events in the course of the coronavirus lockdown.

The prime minister will miss the Commons vote on a Labour-led movement calling for the privileges committee investigation as a result of he’s on an official go to to India.

Tory MPs had initially been ordered to again a authorities modification which might defer any choice on referring the matter to the committee till after the conclusion of the Met Police inquiry.

But in a late U-turn shortly earlier than the controversy started, Commons chief Mark Spencer mentioned there can be a free vote for Tory MPs.

It follows hypothesis at Westminster that Tory MPs weren’t ready to again the federal government’s try and kick the problem into the lengthy grass.

The scale of Tory unease was set out by public administration and constitutional affairs committee chairman William Wragg, who confirmed he had submitted a letter of no confidence in Mr Johnson’s management.

“I cannot reconcile myself to the prime minister’s continued leadership of our country and the Conservative Party,” he instructed MPs.

In a scathing speech, Mr Wragg mentioned: “There could be few colleagues on this facet of the House I’d contend who’re really having fun with being members of parliament in the intervening time.

“It is utterly depressing to be asked to defend the indefensible. Each time part of us withers.”

Former minister Steve Baker, an influential organiser on the Tory benches, mentioned Mr Johnson “should be long gone”.

“Really, the prime minister should just know the gig’s up,” Mr Baker, who was a distinguished Brexiteer concerned in ousting Theresa May, mentioned.

Asked on the primary day of his commerce mission to India whether or not he knowingly or unknowingly misled parliament, Mr Johnson mentioned: “Of course not.”

He instructed reporters: “I’m very keen for every possible form of scrutiny and the House of Commons can do whatever it wants to do. But all I would say is I don’t think that should happen until the investigation is completed.” – PA

Source hyperlink

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.